Pam Bondi Announces Transgender-Related Lawsuit Against State of Maine

Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi announced today that she is filing a civil lawsuit against the state of Maine in connection with its recent transgender-related policies involving youth services and healthcare administration.

At a press conference held this morning, Bondi explained that the lawsuit is being brought on behalf of a group of parents and advocacy organizations who claim that Maine’s current guidelines have infringed upon what they describe as “parental rights and informed consent procedures” in specific medical and educational settings.

Trump DOJ sues Maine in standoff over transgender athletes in women's  sports - ABC News

The legal challenge focuses primarily on recent changes to healthcare access and gender identity support systems implemented across Maine’s public institutions. According to the complaint, these changes allegedly permit minors to access gender-related services without adequate parental notification or participation in the decision-making process.

Bondi emphasized during her address that the case is centered on procedural concerns and regulatory oversight, rather than any form of identity-based objection. “This is not about who someone is or how they live. This case is about whether certain policies overstep legal boundaries and whether families are being excluded from essential decisions,” she stated.

The lawsuit is expected to be filed in U.S. District Court later this week. Bondi’s legal team is requesting an injunction to halt portions of the current guidelines while the case proceeds.

A spokesperson for Maine’s Department of Health and Human Services responded to the announcement, saying, “We have not yet reviewed the complaint in full, but we stand behind the legality and intent of our current policies, which are designed to ensure access, safety, and support for all residents, including transgender youth.”

Bondi clarified that her clients include parents of both transgender and non-transgender children. The suit alleges that lack of transparency around counseling and medical consultation has caused confusion, emotional distress, and, in some cases, a breakdown in family communication.

May be an image of 4 people, people swimming and text

Legal analysts note that this case may hinge on existing federal and state confidentiality laws regarding minors and medical care. At the heart of the argument is whether state institutions are obligated to inform guardians about specific decisions involving gender-affirming care, or whether doing so could violate the privacy rights of the minor.

The Maine Attorney General’s office declined to comment, citing ongoing legal review. However, state officials noted that their policies are based on current healthcare standards and have been reviewed in consultation with legal and psychological experts.

Advocacy organizations on both sides of the debate are preparing to follow the case closely. Some see it as a potential precedent-setting moment for how states across the country structure their policies on youth medical consent.

Bondi, who served as Florida’s Attorney General from 2011 to 2019, is now affiliated with a national legal group that frequently takes on high-profile civil cases. She has stated that she will pursue this case with “respect for all involved,” while insisting on legal accountability for how new regulations are rolled out.

The initial hearing date has not yet been set, but court documents are expected to be made public following the official filing.

In the meantime, school districts, medical providers, and youth counselors in Maine have been advised to continue following existing guidelines unless directed otherwise by the court.

Trump DOJ sues Maine over dispute regarding trans athlete

As of now, there is no indication that other states will be directly impacted by the outcome of the case, though legal experts believe the implications could eventually extend beyond Maine’s borders.

Bondi concluded her remarks with a call for dialogue. “This case isn’t about division,” she said. “It’s about clarity, communication, and ensuring every voice in the process is heard.”